Introduzione The question of who wins or loses in the policy process lies at the heart of recent research into both interest groups and public policy. However, one of the most difficult challenges when empirically analysing interest groups consists in knowing exactly how to measure their influence: despite the fact that this question has been addressed by political scientists for decades, significant problems remain regarding both the conceptual definition and empirical measurement of influence. In order to develop a better understanding of interest group influence, I recommend as follows: (a) that such influence be conceptualized as a degree of preference attainment; (b) that the degree of generality of the concept be downgraded, by breaking it up on the basis of two fundamental dimensions: the lobbying direction (pro-status quo or anti-status quo) and the policy-making stage (agenda setting; decision making; implementation); (c) to proceed with a manual hand-coding in order to obtain a list of the policy issues around which interest groups lobby; (d) to resort to an expert survey in order to evaluate these issues. This methodological approach is used to empirically measure the influence that Italy's professional orders had on the liberalization process championed by the second Prodi government in 2006.

How To Measure Interest Group Influence: Italy’s Professional Orders and Liberalisation Policy

PRITONI, Andrea
2015

Abstract

Introduzione The question of who wins or loses in the policy process lies at the heart of recent research into both interest groups and public policy. However, one of the most difficult challenges when empirically analysing interest groups consists in knowing exactly how to measure their influence: despite the fact that this question has been addressed by political scientists for decades, significant problems remain regarding both the conceptual definition and empirical measurement of influence. In order to develop a better understanding of interest group influence, I recommend as follows: (a) that such influence be conceptualized as a degree of preference attainment; (b) that the degree of generality of the concept be downgraded, by breaking it up on the basis of two fundamental dimensions: the lobbying direction (pro-status quo or anti-status quo) and the policy-making stage (agenda setting; decision making; implementation); (c) to proceed with a manual hand-coding in order to obtain a list of the policy issues around which interest groups lobby; (d) to resort to an expert survey in order to evaluate these issues. This methodological approach is used to empirically measure the influence that Italy's professional orders had on the liberalization process championed by the second Prodi government in 2006.
2015
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
influence; interest groups; Italy; methods; professional orders; public policy;
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pritoni (IPSR 2.2015).pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Published version
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 334.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
334.83 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia
63624 How To Measure Interest Group Influence.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Accepted version (post-print)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 151.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
151.54 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11384/63624
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact