There are two main frameworks currently used to present information (in particular, related to scientific fields). A document redacted with the standard LaTeX / PDF toolbox. Pros: these documents are state-of-the-art quality. Cons: the final user has no way of interacting with a PDF document (other than sending an e-mail to the original authors) The Web 2.0 way (think of: Wikipedia or Stack Exchange ). Pros: in those frameworks, content is continuously developed and augmented by users. Cons: the end result, though, is fragmented, and cannot (in general) be presented as an unified document. A ColDoc tries to get the best of two publishing frameworks.

ColDoc Project

Mennucci, Andrea Carlo Giuseppe
Software
2020

Abstract

There are two main frameworks currently used to present information (in particular, related to scientific fields). A document redacted with the standard LaTeX / PDF toolbox. Pros: these documents are state-of-the-art quality. Cons: the final user has no way of interacting with a PDF document (other than sending an e-mail to the original authors) The Web 2.0 way (think of: Wikipedia or Stack Exchange ). Pros: in those frameworks, content is continuously developed and augmented by users. Cons: the end result, though, is fragmented, and cannot (in general) be presented as an unified document. A ColDoc tries to get the best of two publishing frameworks.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ColDoc.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Manuale descrittivo
Tipologia: Published version
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 206.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
206.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11384/101816
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact