There are two main frameworks currently used to present information (in particular, related to scientific fields). A document redacted with the standard LaTeX / PDF toolbox. Pros: these documents are state-of-the-art quality. Cons: the final user has no way of interacting with a PDF document (other than sending an e-mail to the original authors) The Web 2.0 way (think of: Wikipedia or Stack Exchange ). Pros: in those frameworks, content is continuously developed and augmented by users. Cons: the end result, though, is fragmented, and cannot (in general) be presented as an unified document. A ColDoc tries to get the best of two publishing frameworks.
ColDoc Project
Mennucci, Andrea Carlo Giuseppe
Software
2020-01-01
Abstract
There are two main frameworks currently used to present information (in particular, related to scientific fields). A document redacted with the standard LaTeX / PDF toolbox. Pros: these documents are state-of-the-art quality. Cons: the final user has no way of interacting with a PDF document (other than sending an e-mail to the original authors) The Web 2.0 way (think of: Wikipedia or Stack Exchange ). Pros: in those frameworks, content is continuously developed and augmented by users. Cons: the end result, though, is fragmented, and cannot (in general) be presented as an unified document. A ColDoc tries to get the best of two publishing frameworks.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ColDoc.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Manuale descrittivo
Tipologia:
Published version
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
206.99 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
206.99 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
