There are two main frameworks currently used to present information (in particular, related to scientific fields). A document redacted with the standard LaTeX / PDF toolbox. Pros: these documents are state-of-the-art quality. Cons: the final user has no way of interacting with a PDF document (other than sending an e-mail to the original authors) The Web 2.0 way (think of: Wikipedia or Stack Exchange ). Pros: in those frameworks, content is continuously developed and augmented by users. Cons: the end result, though, is fragmented, and cannot (in general) be presented as an unified document. A ColDoc tries to get the best of two publishing frameworks.
ColDoc Project
Mennucci, Andrea Carlo Giuseppe
Software
2020
Abstract
There are two main frameworks currently used to present information (in particular, related to scientific fields). A document redacted with the standard LaTeX / PDF toolbox. Pros: these documents are state-of-the-art quality. Cons: the final user has no way of interacting with a PDF document (other than sending an e-mail to the original authors) The Web 2.0 way (think of: Wikipedia or Stack Exchange ). Pros: in those frameworks, content is continuously developed and augmented by users. Cons: the end result, though, is fragmented, and cannot (in general) be presented as an unified document. A ColDoc tries to get the best of two publishing frameworks.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ColDoc.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Manuale descrittivo
Tipologia:
Published version
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
206.99 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
206.99 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.