The Latin-Romance continuum, with its two and a half millennia of documented history and with the great amount of scholarly work that has been carried out on it, still presents the historical linguist not only with unsolved problems, which is obvious, but also, less trivially, with the challenging opportunity to apply to these problems the method of historical linguistics in its fullest form. As Ferdinand de Saussure puts it, "la linguistique diachronique suppose à la fois une perspective prospective, qui suit le cours du temps, et une perspective rétrospective, qui le remonte". For any given fact, thus, a sound diachronic account must reconcile the evidence coming from reconstruction (perspective rétrospective) – which in turn consists of two operations, internal and comparative reconstruction – with that coming from philological inspection of extant relevant records (perspective prospective). This is well possible, in principle, within the Latin-Romance domain. In practice, however, much of the research that is currently being done on the diachronic development of the Romance languages (especially the kind of research one is likely to find in 'leading journals' in formal linguistics) does not exploit all the relevant evidence and as a result often produces accounts that demonstrably fail to hold water. Such accounts rest moreover on the underlying assumption that views work in (diachronic) linguistics as being primarily a contribution to a grander enterprise in which a general model of linguistic theory is being tested and developed. This same emphasis on theory, especially if contested, will duly verge on the dogmatic. Alternatively, historical linguistics can be conceived as an (autonomous) problem-solving discipline: in this vein, what really matters is the intrinsic merit of the specific analyses (in terms of economy and empirical scope) rather than their embedding within this or that general model. The point is illustrated with examples drawn from the study of sound change from Latin to Romance.

Facts, theory and dogmas in historical linguistics: vowel quantity from Latin to Romance

Michele Loporcaro
2007

Abstract

The Latin-Romance continuum, with its two and a half millennia of documented history and with the great amount of scholarly work that has been carried out on it, still presents the historical linguist not only with unsolved problems, which is obvious, but also, less trivially, with the challenging opportunity to apply to these problems the method of historical linguistics in its fullest form. As Ferdinand de Saussure puts it, "la linguistique diachronique suppose à la fois une perspective prospective, qui suit le cours du temps, et une perspective rétrospective, qui le remonte". For any given fact, thus, a sound diachronic account must reconcile the evidence coming from reconstruction (perspective rétrospective) – which in turn consists of two operations, internal and comparative reconstruction – with that coming from philological inspection of extant relevant records (perspective prospective). This is well possible, in principle, within the Latin-Romance domain. In practice, however, much of the research that is currently being done on the diachronic development of the Romance languages (especially the kind of research one is likely to find in 'leading journals' in formal linguistics) does not exploit all the relevant evidence and as a result often produces accounts that demonstrably fail to hold water. Such accounts rest moreover on the underlying assumption that views work in (diachronic) linguistics as being primarily a contribution to a grander enterprise in which a general model of linguistic theory is being tested and developed. This same emphasis on theory, especially if contested, will duly verge on the dogmatic. Alternatively, historical linguistics can be conceived as an (autonomous) problem-solving discipline: in this vein, what really matters is the intrinsic merit of the specific analyses (in terms of economy and empirical scope) rather than their embedding within this or that general model. The point is illustrated with examples drawn from the study of sound change from Latin to Romance.
2007
Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia e Linguistica
17th International conference on historical linguistics
Madison, Wisconsin (USA)
31 Luglio - 5 Agosto 2005
Historical linguistics 2005 : selected papers from the 17th International conference on historical linguistics, Madison, Wisconsin, 31 July-5 August 2005
John Benjamins
978-90-272-4799-5
Romance diachronic phonology; contrastive vowel length; variation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
117_Loporcaro2005_ICHL 17_VQuantity.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Published version
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 274.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
274.31 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia
117_Loporcaro_2005_VQuantity_post review.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Accepted version (post-print)
Licenza: Solo Lettura
Dimensione 316.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
316.89 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11384/123906
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact