The variety of Sicilian spoken in Pantelleria has developed a progressive construction which involves pronominal subject clitics. This is striking in many respects. Firstly, on a Romance scale, subject clitics are usually regarded as characteristic for varieties spoken north of Florence. Secondly, in none of the central Romance dialects where subject clitics are known to occur do these convey progressive meaning. The latter seems to be unusual on a larger scale too, as none of the strategies for progressive marking reported in the relevant literature on linguistic typology seems to be directly comparable with the one displayed by Pantiscu. Besides, the results of the present study have some consequences for grammaticalization theory, as they suggest that recent revisions of Hopper & Traugott's `cline of grammaticalization' are not on the right track and that the cline originally proposed should rather be revised so as to include the distinction between syntactic and phonological cliticization.

A new strategy for progressive marking and its implications for grammaticalization theory : the subject clitic construction of Pantiscu

Loporcaro, Michele
2012

Abstract

The variety of Sicilian spoken in Pantelleria has developed a progressive construction which involves pronominal subject clitics. This is striking in many respects. Firstly, on a Romance scale, subject clitics are usually regarded as characteristic for varieties spoken north of Florence. Secondly, in none of the central Romance dialects where subject clitics are known to occur do these convey progressive meaning. The latter seems to be unusual on a larger scale too, as none of the strategies for progressive marking reported in the relevant literature on linguistic typology seems to be directly comparable with the one displayed by Pantiscu. Besides, the results of the present study have some consequences for grammaticalization theory, as they suggest that recent revisions of Hopper & Traugott's `cline of grammaticalization' are not on the right track and that the cline originally proposed should rather be revised so as to include the distinction between syntactic and phonological cliticization.
2012
Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia e Linguistica
Progressive aspect; subject clitics; syntactic vs. phonological cliticization; grammaticalization; evolutionary cline; Italo-Romance dialect variation
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
176_Loporcaro_2012_Pantiscu progressive_StL.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Published version
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 336.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
336.21 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia
176_Loporcaro_2012_Pantiscu progressive_StL_post_print.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Accepted version (post-print)
Licenza: Solo Lettura
Dimensione 761.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
761.13 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11384/124122
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact