Housman used to say criticus nascitur, non fit. He borrowed the motto from Ruhnken’s Elogium of Hemsterhuys and reused it in his famous essay The Application of Thought, just as he borrowed from the same Elogium the two key qualities for a critic, ἀγχίνοια and εὐστοχία, in the preface of his Manilius. Therefore, it is not by chance that Nisbet called Eustochia the “Muse of Textual Conjecture”, nor that Pasquali said that a palaeographer nascitur et fit.

Eustochia e critica congetturale: tra Bentley, Ruhnken, Housman (poi Nisbet e Pasquali)

Federica Scognamiglio
2021

Abstract

Housman used to say criticus nascitur, non fit. He borrowed the motto from Ruhnken’s Elogium of Hemsterhuys and reused it in his famous essay The Application of Thought, just as he borrowed from the same Elogium the two key qualities for a critic, ἀγχίνοια and εὐστοχία, in the preface of his Manilius. Therefore, it is not by chance that Nisbet called Eustochia the “Muse of Textual Conjecture”, nor that Pasquali said that a palaeographer nascitur et fit.
2021
Settore L-FIL-LET/05 - Filologia Classica
Classical Scholarship; Housman; Pasquali; conjectures; textual criticism; criticus
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Scognamiglio Eikasmos 32 (2021).pdf

Open Access dal 01/12/2023

Tipologia: Published version
Licenza: Solo Lettura
Dimensione 727.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
727.92 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11384/126583
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact