In this paper, we sift the evidence for overdifferentiated gender marking on lower numerals in Medieval Italo-Romance. While the dialects of most of Northern Italy still preserve a masculine vs feminine contrast on ‘two’ and ‘three’ to this day, their ancestors in the Middle Ages, as reflected in early Italo-Romance texts, featured in addition a third form of each (doa, trea), which was selected by just a few nouns ending in -a (e.g. Old Venetan doa para ‘two pairs’). These forms, it is argued, are not innovations – unlike claimed by some – but rather the legitimate outcome of previously regular neuter agreeing forms, to be traced back to (late) Latin in a straight line. By the time the earliest extant documentation of Northern Italo-Romance emerged, these neuter forms of the numerals were quite isolated in the respective systems, as neuter agreement had long been obliterated on other agreement targets (residual persistence of a-agreement on adjectives – it is also shown – is much more sporadic in Medieval Northern Italy than in the South). Such isolation made the occurrence of doa (alongside masc. doi and fem. doe) a case of overdifferentiated gender marking.
Il marcamento di genere iperdifferenziato sui numerali e i residui del neutro nei volgari settentrionali antichi
Michele Loporcaro
;Lorenzo Tomasin
2016
Abstract
In this paper, we sift the evidence for overdifferentiated gender marking on lower numerals in Medieval Italo-Romance. While the dialects of most of Northern Italy still preserve a masculine vs feminine contrast on ‘two’ and ‘three’ to this day, their ancestors in the Middle Ages, as reflected in early Italo-Romance texts, featured in addition a third form of each (doa, trea), which was selected by just a few nouns ending in -a (e.g. Old Venetan doa para ‘two pairs’). These forms, it is argued, are not innovations – unlike claimed by some – but rather the legitimate outcome of previously regular neuter agreeing forms, to be traced back to (late) Latin in a straight line. By the time the earliest extant documentation of Northern Italo-Romance emerged, these neuter forms of the numerals were quite isolated in the respective systems, as neuter agreement had long been obliterated on other agreement targets (residual persistence of a-agreement on adjectives – it is also shown – is much more sporadic in Medieval Northern Italy than in the South). Such isolation made the occurrence of doa (alongside masc. doi and fem. doe) a case of overdifferentiated gender marking.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
201_loporcaro_tomasin_LeSt2016.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Published version
Licenza:
Non pubblico
Dimensione
662 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
662 kB | Adobe PDF | Richiedi una copia |
201_Loporcaro_Tomasin_2016_postprint.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Accepted version (post-print)
Licenza:
Solo Lettura
Dimensione
627.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
627.18 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.