A widely-held tenet of Romance historical linguistics has it that the tripartite gender system of Latin shrunk to a binary system (masculine vs. feminine) very early. We argue that the evidence from several modern central-southern Italo-Romance dialects is at odds with this reconstruction, since they display a four-gender system, featuring also two distinct successors of the Latin neuter: one is a target gender (selecting dedicated agreement forms), which has a neat semantic correlate as it only hosts mass nouns; the other is a controller gender with no dedicated targets, hosting the local counterparts of Italian nouns like il braccio/le braccia. Focusing on first-hand data from dialects of Marche and Lucania, and drawing on evidence available from literature on other central-southern varieties, we demonstrate that these nouns have a different status than in Italian. Within the framework of canonical typology, we show that they are best analysed as belonging to a non-autonomous gender. Special attention will be paid to the inflectional classes these nouns belong to and to the agreement patterns they select – particularly under resolution, with reciprocal and distributive pronominal expressions, and when modified through evaluative suffixes.

Persistenza del neutro nell'italo-romanzo centro-meridionale

Loporcaro, Michele
2013

Abstract

A widely-held tenet of Romance historical linguistics has it that the tripartite gender system of Latin shrunk to a binary system (masculine vs. feminine) very early. We argue that the evidence from several modern central-southern Italo-Romance dialects is at odds with this reconstruction, since they display a four-gender system, featuring also two distinct successors of the Latin neuter: one is a target gender (selecting dedicated agreement forms), which has a neat semantic correlate as it only hosts mass nouns; the other is a controller gender with no dedicated targets, hosting the local counterparts of Italian nouns like il braccio/le braccia. Focusing on first-hand data from dialects of Marche and Lucania, and drawing on evidence available from literature on other central-southern varieties, we demonstrate that these nouns have a different status than in Italian. Within the framework of canonical typology, we show that they are best analysed as belonging to a non-autonomous gender. Special attention will be paid to the inflectional classes these nouns belong to and to the agreement patterns they select – particularly under resolution, with reciprocal and distributive pronominal expressions, and when modified through evaluative suffixes.
2013
Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia e Linguistica
Settore L-FIL-LET/12 - Linguistica Italiana
linguistica romanza; dialettologia italiana; genere grammaticale; morfologia; sintassi; grammatical gender (target vs. controller); neuter; inflectional class; language change; dialect variation; canonical typology
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
187_Paciaroni_Nolé_Loporcaro_Neutro it c-merid.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published version
Licenza: Solo Lettura
Dimensione 295.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
295.42 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11384/128324
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact