Political entrepreneurship of the European Commission in the field of disinformation can be interpreted as a successful example of agenda-coupling concurrently addressing the need to regulate digital markets and democratic elections and thus expanding EU regulatory authority and facilitating transformative policy change. As part of the EU digital strategy, the market-corrective efforts of the EU democracy initiatives remain subordinated to the broader objective of ensuring innovation and competitiveness of open digital markets and to build «digital sovereignty» of the EU for the future. The study examines the gradual and slow shift of agenda of disinformation as an external threat to disinformation as an internal challenge to democracy with a focus on political parties and elections. In a second part and based on a systematic content analysis of the Commission’s documents leading to the drafting of the «European Democracy Action» between 2017 and 2022, we reconstruct the EU’s institutional pathway of establishing a disinformation regulatory agenda in terms of problem diagnosis, areas of intervention and main interlocutors.

Saving the Elections : EU Strategies to Fight Disinformation in the Age of Post-truth Politics

Sampugnaro, Rossana
;
Trenz, Hans-Jörg
2024

Abstract

Political entrepreneurship of the European Commission in the field of disinformation can be interpreted as a successful example of agenda-coupling concurrently addressing the need to regulate digital markets and democratic elections and thus expanding EU regulatory authority and facilitating transformative policy change. As part of the EU digital strategy, the market-corrective efforts of the EU democracy initiatives remain subordinated to the broader objective of ensuring innovation and competitiveness of open digital markets and to build «digital sovereignty» of the EU for the future. The study examines the gradual and slow shift of agenda of disinformation as an external threat to disinformation as an internal challenge to democracy with a focus on political parties and elections. In a second part and based on a systematic content analysis of the Commission’s documents leading to the drafting of the «European Democracy Action» between 2017 and 2022, we reconstruct the EU’s institutional pathway of establishing a disinformation regulatory agenda in terms of problem diagnosis, areas of intervention and main interlocutors.
2024
Settore GSPS-06/A - Sociologia dei processi culturali e comunicativi
Digitalisation; disinformation; election integrity; European democracy; post-truth
   Post-truth politics and the resilience of the public sphere in Europe (POPSPHERE), 2023-25
   POPSPHERE
   MUR
   PRIN2022
   E53D23006690006
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
06_SampugnaroTrenz.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Published version
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 126.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
126.1 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia
8_Sampugnaro-Trenz_text (1).pdf

embargo fino al 31/10/2025

Tipologia: Accepted version (post-print)
Licenza: Solo Lettura
Dimensione 367.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
367.61 kB Adobe PDF   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11384/150543
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact