This article examines the feminist campaign #EnContra, which emerged in Chile in response to the 2023 constitutional plebiscite led by far-right actors. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted between September and December 2023, this study analyses how autonomous feminist groups collectively diagnosed the socio-political threat posed by the proposed constitution and mobilized against it through a multifaceted strategy. Through assemblies, working groups and territorial outreach, feminist actors reframed the constitutional proposal as a threat not only to reproductive rights and gender equality, but to democracy itself. The analysis shows how feminists developed a counter-narrative grounded in urgency, clarity and collective memory, using slogans such as #EsPeor (‘it’s worse [than the current constitution]’) and #EsPeligrosa (‘it’s dangerous’) to connect with broader audiences and navigate the dilemma of opposing a flawed text without legitimizing the Pinochet-era constitution it sought to replace. In a context marked by democratic backsliding and the resurgence of ultra-conservative ideologies globally, the Chilean case offers a valuable lens to explore how feminist movements confront institutionalized threats to gender and sexual rights. The #EnContra campaign exemplifies the capacity of feminist movements to act strategically in moments of institutional threat, while sustaining broader visions of democracy, care and collective life.
Feminist strategies against the far right in Chile: the #EnContra campaign and the 2023 exit plebiscite
Rosario Freire Saray
2026
Abstract
This article examines the feminist campaign #EnContra, which emerged in Chile in response to the 2023 constitutional plebiscite led by far-right actors. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted between September and December 2023, this study analyses how autonomous feminist groups collectively diagnosed the socio-political threat posed by the proposed constitution and mobilized against it through a multifaceted strategy. Through assemblies, working groups and territorial outreach, feminist actors reframed the constitutional proposal as a threat not only to reproductive rights and gender equality, but to democracy itself. The analysis shows how feminists developed a counter-narrative grounded in urgency, clarity and collective memory, using slogans such as #EsPeor (‘it’s worse [than the current constitution]’) and #EsPeligrosa (‘it’s dangerous’) to connect with broader audiences and navigate the dilemma of opposing a flawed text without legitimizing the Pinochet-era constitution it sought to replace. In a context marked by democratic backsliding and the resurgence of ultra-conservative ideologies globally, the Chilean case offers a valuable lens to explore how feminist movements confront institutionalized threats to gender and sexual rights. The #EnContra campaign exemplifies the capacity of feminist movements to act strategically in moments of institutional threat, while sustaining broader visions of democracy, care and collective life.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



