During the last decades, social sciences have shown a growing interest in the animal issue, and historical studies are not excluded from this process. In this article, we will show that the concern for the role of animals in historical events is not recent. Indeed, it had already been at the heart of the debate on domestication which, in the first half of the 19th century, brought together naturalists, historians, philosophers and anthropologists around the topic of the relationship between natural and civil history. It was only towards the end of the 19th century, during the process of epistemological autonomisation of human sciences, that the gap separating the latter from the natural sciences widened, leading to the exclusion of animals from the field of study of historical and social disciplines. We will therefore examine how the long French historiographical season, from the École des Annales to the history of mentalities, fits into these epistemic coordinates. While, on the one hand, we can see in it the blatant example of this animal absence, it is nonetheless possible to detect some of the conditions that made it possible to think about the “animal turn” that we are witnessing in the more recent historiographical debate. It is precisely by collecting and radicalising the legacy of Michel Vovelle, one of the last masters of this fruitful intellectual season, that Pierre Serna was able to inaugurate a research project on the “political history of animals” at the IHRF. This research proposal is part of a rich debate on the history of animals, some of the main options of which we will examine.

Les « silences rebelles » des bêtes : la place des animaux dans le débat historiographique en France

Piazzesi, Benedetta
2020

Abstract

During the last decades, social sciences have shown a growing interest in the animal issue, and historical studies are not excluded from this process. In this article, we will show that the concern for the role of animals in historical events is not recent. Indeed, it had already been at the heart of the debate on domestication which, in the first half of the 19th century, brought together naturalists, historians, philosophers and anthropologists around the topic of the relationship between natural and civil history. It was only towards the end of the 19th century, during the process of epistemological autonomisation of human sciences, that the gap separating the latter from the natural sciences widened, leading to the exclusion of animals from the field of study of historical and social disciplines. We will therefore examine how the long French historiographical season, from the École des Annales to the history of mentalities, fits into these epistemic coordinates. While, on the one hand, we can see in it the blatant example of this animal absence, it is nonetheless possible to detect some of the conditions that made it possible to think about the “animal turn” that we are witnessing in the more recent historiographical debate. It is precisely by collecting and radicalising the legacy of Michel Vovelle, one of the last masters of this fruitful intellectual season, that Pierre Serna was able to inaugurate a research project on the “political history of animals” at the IHRF. This research proposal is part of a rich debate on the history of animals, some of the main options of which we will examine.
2020
Settore L-ART/02 - Storia dell'Arte Moderna
Animal history; political animal history; Vovelle, Michel
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Les_silences_rebelles_des_betes_La_place.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Published version
Licenza: Solo Lettura
Dimensione 292.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
292.01 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11384/89345
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact